By modeling the effect of various mass planets at different distances (and thus periods), scientists can strip away the modeled value and use the residuals to calculate the size of the next smallest planet. I made the largest planet the red line, which has the most influence on the star. Much like Jupiter here in our solar system, it dominates the star's motion and likewise, small errors in the red line are probably just as significant as the total influence of smaller planets (like that grey line).
The blue line actually includes the influence of 7 planets here, but the fact is that after I plotted the third planet, you couldn't even see the influence of any of the smaller planets. The Goldylocks planet Gliese 581g pulls at Gliese as much as 1 m, which is durn close to the precision of the technique they are using to measure relative velocity. Also note, that in this little model I have here, the largest influence moves the star by as much as 10,000. That means that the technique, including the modelling component, needs to be accurate and precise to one part in 10,000. While this level of accuracy is not unheard of, especially in the physics world, it would not surprise me if the planet is discovered to be a rounding error sometime in the next decade.
No comments:
Post a Comment